• Brgor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I read through the report. The pilot believed it to be carbon fiber reinforced abs, which should have had a higher weakening temp than the stock fiberglass part. Apparently it didn’t though. They don’t identify the actual material in the report.

    • velindora@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, the pilot was lied to. That is definitely not carbon fiber On top of ABS. You can see where the print is falling apart. I’m certainly no expert, but that poor photo in the article definitely looks like a cheap piece of shit… Relative to what I imagine aircraft parts are like normally

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        carbon fiber filament just has tiny chobbed fibers in it to stabilize the material. it’s not really a strength additive, definitely not in the way an actual woven sheet is. and you can’t always tell if a printed part is CF filament or not, though you often can have a good idea

        • velindora@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Whoever made this should have just covered it in fiberglass, or used it to make a mold for a stronger material.

          But I guess The point of this whole thing is that whoever made this was definitely not qualified!

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        “carbon fiber” filament usually has little shards of carbon fibers suspended in it. This makes the part less flexible than raw ABS…when cool. It’s not like they do a layup of carbon fiber over 3D printed ABS, that would almost defeat the purpose.

        If they’d done that, 3D print a mold or buck and then do a carbon layup over it, it’d be made of epoxy, which doesn’t melt.

      • Brgor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This was part “only” meant to funnel air into the engine, so I could see why he wouldn’t think it would be a problem. And I think it’s more like the carbon fiber impregnated abs, than coated. I paraphrased the report, so that’s on me.

        • velindora@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Anyone worth their weight in abs knows “carbon fiber impregnated abs” isn’t going to actually do a FRACTION of the job that literal carbon fiber—or even fiberglass—would do, and this pilot is lucky they didn’t kill someone.

          It just goes to show how little people know about carbon fiber and how easily Tricked they are when someone says they mixed carbon fiber into melted plastic… Laughing my fucking ass off

          • Brgor@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not the strength they were worried about, it was the temperature at which it weakend, which shouldn’t have been a problem according the the information provided to the pilot.

            I don’t know the material data sheet was wrong or the person selling it to him was wrong or lying. We don’t and won’t know, because they didn’t try to identify it.