I have seen “nuance” used as a weapon against most important and most trivial things of time, being complicit in genocide and ecocide is nuanced because there are oh I important living standards to uphold (I don’t see any decent living standards which need complete complicity in genocide in Sudan, Congo, and Palestine for example), this was an example for most important thing but now I will give an example of most trivial thing, companies increasing prices of games and ending physical copies, people say ‘it’s nuanced’ from explaining economics to talking about digital consumer rights, if you say “just bring about the DotP and it’ll be fine” for everything from genocides to anti-comsuner practices, you’re not a comrade, you’re a glorified hustle bro.

    • Letztertod [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Most will disagree, for them it is immature, for them the mature and good thing is ‘pragmatically’ support the genocidal states while making condition for their home better and just fight for the better version of the world our overlords are creating. I swear if these people were alive in 1980s, they would justify why Deng supported Pol Pot.