Ok. So your question is about energy density (in terms of time). In which case, nuclear reactions simply produce much more. And is entirely reasonable to say that. Solar power, wind power and geothermal power are all methods of indirectly collecting energy from nuclear energy sources.
To which conversations about liquid thorium fluoride being used in thermal cycles in industrial processes is definitely a valid one.
The reason why most people discuss solar is because it scales down nicely to satisfy domestic energy needs (which reduces the total energy consumption of the more dense energy sources that are needed in industrial processes).
Dominating other civilizations is actually rather wasteful, it is much more efficient to just bring up the living standards and then they will happily incorporate themselves in your civilization. Which brings more useful minds and new perspectives that would enrich your scientific tapestry; which is likely the keys to the next sets of breakthroughs. (You don’t have to defeat your enemies militarily if you can bribe the right people and get them to destroy themselves for you).
Efficiencies free up resources to be utilized for whatever your civilization values. Much like how certain keystone crops (like corn, wheat, rice and potatoes) make up the hyper majority of calories consumed because they are the most efficient.
Only a foolish civilization would throw away efficiency and returns on investments. And the biggest return on investment has always been feeding people and public libraries.
The amount of joules per unit of times is POWER, measured in watts
Efficiency is a concept that has no units. Efficiency just looks at how many joules get wasted that isn’t the work you want to do.
However, notable is that nearly every physical process does not maximize efficiency when it maximizes power. This means you have to throw out power or reduce power to optimzed efficiency, which is the cost of pursuing efficiency to living systems.
Life’s goal is that life maximizes the rate, not the efficiency. The amount of waste product is generally not important.
Efficiencies free up resources to be utilized for whatever your civilization values.
Or you can simply grow your resources you’re exploiting.
Let’s say you have
Turtle species A that eats three pizzas a week.
Hare species B that easts three pizzas a week.
Turtles decide to order 2 pizzas and save $ off the budget and carefully manage the leftovers to reduce spending. If they went to the downward limit, they could save no more than 3 pizzas reduction.
Hares put 5 pizza restaurants on speed dial and throw the budget out and have a massive pizza party paid for with credit cards. There is not any upward limit to this growth.
Basically the more efficiently a civilization uses a resource, the higher overall consumption of that resource becomes. It also applies to production. (The more efficiently something is produced, the lower the cost and ultimately greater the consumption of it occurs)
Ok. So your question is about energy density (in terms of time). In which case, nuclear reactions simply produce much more. And is entirely reasonable to say that. Solar power, wind power and geothermal power are all methods of indirectly collecting energy from nuclear energy sources.
To which conversations about liquid thorium fluoride being used in thermal cycles in industrial processes is definitely a valid one.
The reason why most people discuss solar is because it scales down nicely to satisfy domestic energy needs (which reduces the total energy consumption of the more dense energy sources that are needed in industrial processes).
Dominating other civilizations is actually rather wasteful, it is much more efficient to just bring up the living standards and then they will happily incorporate themselves in your civilization. Which brings more useful minds and new perspectives that would enrich your scientific tapestry; which is likely the keys to the next sets of breakthroughs. (You don’t have to defeat your enemies militarily if you can bribe the right people and get them to destroy themselves for you).
Efficiencies free up resources to be utilized for whatever your civilization values. Much like how certain keystone crops (like corn, wheat, rice and potatoes) make up the hyper majority of calories consumed because they are the most efficient.
Only a foolish civilization would throw away efficiency and returns on investments. And the biggest return on investment has always been feeding people and public libraries.
The amount of joules per unit of times is POWER, measured in watts
Efficiency is a concept that has no units. Efficiency just looks at how many joules get wasted that isn’t the work you want to do.
However, notable is that nearly every physical process does not maximize efficiency when it maximizes power. This means you have to throw out power or reduce power to optimzed efficiency, which is the cost of pursuing efficiency to living systems.
Life’s goal is that life maximizes the rate, not the efficiency. The amount of waste product is generally not important.
Or you can simply grow your resources you’re exploiting.
Let’s say you have
Turtle species A that eats three pizzas a week. Hare species B that easts three pizzas a week.
Turtles decide to order 2 pizzas and save $ off the budget and carefully manage the leftovers to reduce spending. If they went to the downward limit, they could save no more than 3 pizzas reduction.
Hares put 5 pizza restaurants on speed dial and throw the budget out and have a massive pizza party paid for with credit cards. There is not any upward limit to this growth.
Who wins the life race?
Well, as we don’t exist with perpetual abundance and ecological overshoot routinely occurs.
And the hares suffer the same fate as the bunnies.
https://bsidneysmith.com/writings/essays/all-the-bunnies-in-the-meadow-die
You probably mean that the hares suffer the same as the tortoises.
But inverting that, the tortoises suffer the same fate as the hares, right?
So it’s not efficiency that matters. Here are two groups that pursue different efficiency optimums, and it makes no difference?
Are you familiar with Jevons paradox?
Basically the more efficiently a civilization uses a resource, the higher overall consumption of that resource becomes. It also applies to production. (The more efficiently something is produced, the lower the cost and ultimately greater the consumption of it occurs)