fluid_neutral@lemmy.today to science@lemmy.world · 1 year agoExcess deaths in 2023 confirmedwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down147
arrow-up1-41arrow-down1external-linkExcess deaths in 2023 confirmedwww.youtube.comfluid_neutral@lemmy.today to science@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareMaple Engineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down1·1 year agoJohn Lorimer Campbell is an English YouTuber and retired nurse educator known for his videos about the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, the videos received praise, but they later veered into misinformation.[2] He has been criticised for suggesting COVID-19 deaths have been over-counted, repeating false claims about the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, and providing misleading commentary about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.[3][4][5]
minus-squarePrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoNote: OP is now PM’ing me about this because I commented. I am blocking them if anyone else wants to do the same.
minus-squarefluid_neutral@lemmy.todayOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down27·1 year agobut information is from peer reviewed studies, he is misleading you, watch and see for yourself
minus-squareMaple Engineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoInformation from peer reviewed studies can be misinterpreted and misrepresented. You can also draw correlating between the results of different peer reviewed studies where none exist. This is not science.
minus-squarefluid_neutral@lemmy.todayOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down10·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
John Lorimer Campbell is an English YouTuber and retired nurse educator known for his videos about the COVID-19 pandemic. Initially, the videos received praise, but they later veered into misinformation.[2] He has been criticised for suggesting COVID-19 deaths have been over-counted, repeating false claims about the use of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, and providing misleading commentary about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.[3][4][5]
Note: OP is now PM’ing me about this because I commented. I am blocking them if anyone else wants to do the same.
Thank you.
but information is from peer reviewed studies, he is misleading you, watch and see for yourself
Information from peer reviewed studies can be misinterpreted and misrepresented. You can also draw correlating between the results of different peer reviewed studies where none exist.
This is not science.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator