• Salamence@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    lenin-tea Looks like someone isnt a big fan of leftist articles, lol

    But it was probably because of the feddit-dbzero drama post lmao

    • Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not computers, it’s the latest drama here in the Fediverse.

      Big frontend called Tessarect did a sneaky.

      They made a hidden shadow-ban list of instances, users, and phrases, keeping it secret from users and admins by not including it in the open source code and instead loading it at runtime, and added in there all non-centrist (instances, users, and phrases) they could think of. They also lied about it, by claiming it to be a technical issue, when any user looked for the banned instances from the front-end, instead of calling it what it is, a targeted exclusion.

      Essentially, hidden censorship, and sliminess.

      To the degree that some people, (like OP here), have taken it as a badge of honor, that they are among the ones banned by name, in that list.

      And some other people, are definitely not jealous.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I post trans memes monthly and study das kapital every day, will I make it to the list next year? I don’t want to un-disappoint my parents!

  • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    We should award everyone on the list with a badge next to their username the same way new users show up with a chick next to theirs.

    (I am not currently on the list and I am slightly salty about it)

    • Binette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not the issue. Admins running the UI and other users didn’t know this was in it.

        • Binette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well yeah, people are changing frontends and warned others that Tesseract has that kind of blocklist and they don’t support it. If people that used the tool didn’t find out until now, it’s mostly a communication issue from the dev. And to the user that knows none the wiser, opinions that they would’ve accessed if not for using Tesseract are essentialy not available. The option to turn it off is essentially hidden, and the user can’t find out that information is being blocked (as seen by the reaction it caused in the threadiverse). It’s censorship by omission of information. Even if they had good intentions, the way they went about it failed to communicate what the blocklist was about, and that information was being blocked in the first place.

          It’s also just kind of a silly thing to implement in a client. That’s the perspective the memes are coming from. Usually, blocklists should be left to the instance administrators or users. The client should only easily allow such a list to be available.

            • Binette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t really know if I was blocked nor do I really care. I’m just explaning why people were upset/making memes about it. It’s shocking once one finds out about the blocklist, but kind of funny in retrospect.