cockmushroom@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 3 months agoThe things people do to sabotage free softwarelemmy.mlimagemessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down13
arrow-up14arrow-down1imageThe things people do to sabotage free softwarelemmy.mlcockmushroom@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 3 months agomessage-square10linkfedilink
minus-squareflamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoThis is correct and fine?
minus-squarecockmushroom@reddthat.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·3 months agoIt’s also a c wrapper
minus-squareflamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoSo? It’s logname, what do you expect, for them to read the bits directly from memory? If you’re going to criticise this for anything, it should be that it doesn’t support Windows, not that it calls out to libc.
minus-squareMagister@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoyeah, all of this to call libc::getlogin().
minus-squarefour@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI no longer use any wrappers or utils, they’re just bloat. Now I just use my dousing rod to read and set bits in my RAM, way more efficient
This is correct and fine?
It’s also a c wrapper
So? It’s
logname, what do you expect, for them to read the bits directly from memory? If you’re going to criticise this for anything, it should be that it doesn’t support Windows, not that it calls out tolibc.yeah, all of this to call libc::getlogin().
I no longer use any wrappers or utils, they’re just bloat. Now I just use my dousing rod to read and set bits in my RAM, way more efficient