After more than ten years of treating patients with a carnivore diet and studying the relationship between diet and chronic disease, I have learned that most of what we are told about healthy eating is not only wrong but is actively making people sicker.

summerizer

Core protocol

  • The carnivore diet is simple: water, fatty meat, and nothing else.
  • Simple execution keeps results from breaking down through added complexity.
  • “Everything in moderation” is poor guidance because some things are harmful at any dose.
  • Junk food, sugar, alcohol, drugs, and cyanide do not become good because the amount is small.
  • Most failure happens in the margins, not from one obvious week of eating cake all day.

Margins and re-exposure

  • People often miss results because they eat too little meat, eat too little fat, or fear fat.
  • The body can only absorb so much fat before excess fat leaves through stools.
  • Soft stools without loose stools are the practical sign that fat intake is high enough.
  • Meat is not magic; the major benefit is removal of substances that cause harm.
  • Small returns to stevia, pop-tarts, salad, asparagus, grains, broccoli, sugar, or alcohol can matter.
  • Sensitive people can relapse from a small trigger, especially with Crohn’s disease or other autoimmune issues.
  • A relapse after re-exposure is like lead poisoning returning after drinking from lead pipes again.

Why the diet works

  • Fatty meat gives the vitamins, minerals, proteins, and fats needed in bioavailable forms and useful proportions.
  • Supplements, powders, pills, and fortified junk cannot make Coca-Cola, dirt, or cereal into proper food.
  • The issue is not only missing nutrients; harmful compounds also arrive with the wrong foods.
  • Plants use defensive chemicals, and those compounds can be a problem for humans.
  • Meat supplies needed nutrients, while plants do not supply anything necessary that meat cannot supply.

Disease mechanisms and examples

  • Chronic disease comes from toxic exposure plus malnutrition caused by a species-inappropriate diet.
  • Low B12 can damage neurological development and neurodegeneration even when values sit near common ranges.
  • High blood sugar glycation damages arteries and blood supply, which drives diabetes complications called carbohydrate poisoning.
  • Ketosis and ketones can improve cardiac output and heart contraction in heart failure.
  • Lean mass hyperresponders challenge the cholesterol model because some high-LDL ketogenic patients do not progress and some reverse plaque.
  • Saturated fat is not the heart-risk story taught in medical school; the JACC work supports that point.
  • Autoimmune conditions fit plant-toxin and lectin mechanisms better than the idea that the body simply attacks itself.
  • Crohn’s disease can improve when diet removes suspected triggers, including through elemental or exclusion-style diets.

Species-specific diet logic

  • Every other animal has a species-appropriate diet and gets sick when fed inappropriate food.
  • Zoos and parks warn people not to feed animals because wrong food makes animals sick.
  • Humans also have specific nutrient needs and specific things that harm us.
  • The modern rise of diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and obesity followed major dietary changes in recent decades.
  • A sick lion is not fixed with carbs, processed food, vegetables, or broccoli, and humans are not fixed by reducing nutrient quality.

Practical finish

  • Plants can work as medicine because medicine is a toxin that can bring more benefit than harm under the right circumstance.
  • Outside that circumstance, those toxins still cause harm.
  • Poor results require checks on strictness, enough food, enough fat, sleep, stress, and fresh air.
  • Some autoimmune cases need only red meat and water, and some need grass-fed and finished red meat and water.
  • The answer is not adding toxins or lowering nutrition; the answer is fixing what remains in the margins.

References

  • nagaram@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    If I enjoy it, yes.

    I drink wine and beer in moderation because it tastes good or interesting (I’ve tried to like hard liquor, but its just not as appealing to me). Its a ritual implement to unwind with. A human art that’s been practiced for thousands of years. Its bad for me, we know that, but its enjoyable.

    The point of “everything in moderation” is to show that foods we consume for pleasure don’t generally cause problems unless consumed regularly or excessively. Obviously when you extend the phrase ad absurdum it will fall apart because its now being applied to absurd things. Hell, it could be applied to healthy things.

    A soda a day is not good for you but that’s such a low amount of sugar and acid that the body can generally handle it. In fact, ive known a great many hills folk well into their 80’s -90’s who drink zero sugar mountain dew daily who i can only hope I will be as active as them at that age.

    Fifty sodas a day is obviously not good for you because that’s more than what the body can adjust for and will probably damage livers and kidneys over time.

    I could do the same about carnivore since the reasonable assumption from his attack on moderation is that I should never do things in moderation. So if carnivore is healthy, more carnivore is more healthy. Instead of one steak a day, I should eat two Tomahawk steaks and I can’t forget my fat so I drink a gallon of bone broth mixed with 50% beef tallow every day. Surely that’s healthy.

    Exercise is good for me so why do it in moderation? I should work out as hard as I can every single day until I pass out from exhaustion.

    Water is good for me? I should drink 3 gallons as quickly as I can, get water poisoning, and die.

    • xep@discuss.onlineM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      A soda a day is not good for you but that’s such a low amount of sugar and acid that the body can generally handle it.

      What’s the threshold?

      Instead of one steak a day, I should eat two Tomahawk steaks and I can’t forget my fat so I drink a gallon of bone broth mixed with 50% beef tallow every day. Surely that’s healthy.

      You are inadvertently correct, although I understand that you are being facetious and coming off once again as being condescending. Why don’t you give this a try? You’ll find that in fact your body knows exactly how many steaks you can eat a day, and you’ll find it impossible to over eat steaks.

      The rest of your points are irrelevant to the discussion at hand. I’ll explain this just once for your understanding, so that you won’t do it again.

      “Everything in moderation” being a falsehood isn’t the same as “good things should not be done in moderation.”

      Do you once again see how the two statements are different? For someone who’s purportedly against this kind of flawed reasoning, you do seem rather fond of doing it yourself.

      Consider this a gentle warning.