• Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ummm, wait what. It costs 88k to mine a bit coin?

    So then Bitcoin mining only makes sense if you also heavily invest in the energy company you’re paying, and even then, it’s just a modified human centipede transaction

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      The idea behind using distributed compute nodes for blockchain was that the blockchain itself would carry applications with commercial value, and the token itself would represent a share in that commercial value which would scale accordingly. There would be no reason to mine coins if those applications never materialized, so effort would always track alongside the intrinsic value of the network itself.

      Bitcoin never developed any real applications, and the entire value was speculation. This meant people raced to mine coins as fast as they could, well beyond the intrinsic value of the app stack (which doesn’t exist). So now the network has effectively collapsed for all intents and purposes, but it is still needed for moving Bitcoin around, so the people who have huge investments already basically have to keep throwing money at mining in order to preserve the “liquidity” of their current stash.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      So then Bitcoin mining only makes sense if you also heavily invest in the energy company

      Correct. Buying your own solar panels or wind turbines. Your mining rig only makes sense when your expected return from the rig is greater than the return you could get from backfeeding the grid.

      Or if you can somehow make use of the “waste” heat, perhaps by heating your home, or preheating water before it reaches your water heater.