not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agohow things become sciencelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square60linkfedilinkarrow-up1188arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1187arrow-down1imagehow things become sciencelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square60linkfedilinkfile-text
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01100-y https://bsky.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:s6yp6jam5og3tftozaw7pjth/post/3mj34sn6kyk25
minus-squaresquaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bohannon#Intentionally_misleading_chocolate_study Yes, people would exactly do the same, because nobody reads anything but the headline of a paper. Even journalists don’t. AI didn’t invent the problem, but it put the problem on steroids.
minus-squareExperiencedWinter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months ago Even journalists don’t Not sure what point your making here, I wouldn’t expect most journalists to be great at reading the details of papers like this…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bohannon#Intentionally_misleading_chocolate_study
Yes, people would exactly do the same, because nobody reads anything but the headline of a paper. Even journalists don’t.
AI didn’t invent the problem, but it put the problem on steroids.
Not sure what point your making here, I wouldn’t expect most journalists to be great at reading the details of papers like this…