• JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Or because trans men don’t have a physical advantage over Cis men competitors in physical competitions.

      • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s neat. Wild how much an affect hormonal changes can have on the body. Humans are weird.

    • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not all Olympic events are about brute strength or reaction time etc.

      There’s equestrian, sailing, shooting, and an array of mixed events where a trans man could have an advantage over a Cis man.

      • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re correct (shooting… women are naturally better shooters than men in my experience.) I agree in competitions that don’t rely on pure physicality this ban wouldn’t make sense, but I don’t agree this is just misogyny versus some other type of prejudice.
        I think a one way ban makes sense in some fields because a trans man competing against cis men is already at a physical disadvantage. That’s not the case if the genders are switched.

        Curling is the only sport in the Olympics that matters and it would probably be fine ungendered.