• FundMECFS@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mexico didn’t exist back then. Europeans hadn’t conquered and genocided and created states in the Americas.

    This was native (indigenous) americans.

      • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        indigeneity and nationality are two different concepts that have nothing to do with each other.

        this can range from indigenous Oaxacans who are US citizens to Mexican citizens who are settlers who murder indigenous people in Mexico to steal their land.

      • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Mexico is a settler colonial state created by Spanish genociders.

        The Mexican ruling class is still largely of european descent. It’s well established that lighter skin correlates with status in Mexico.

      • wieson@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know where exactly maize was cultivated, but Mexico comes from city Mexico-Tenochtitlan.

        They found millenia old traces of maize in the valley of the Rio Balsa in Xihuatoxtla and also in the valley of Tehuacán.

        Something about Coxcatlán phase. Couldn’t find a name of a people who would have been responsible for the domestication.

        It’s easiest to say it happened in Mesoamerica.

            • HorreC@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              No, the people literally called themselves Mexica, they chose to call them Aztecs because they thought it would confuse the people.

              • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                No, they didn’t call themselves “Mexica”.

                They didn’t use the letters “M”, “e”, “x”, “i”, “c”, or even “a”.

                Regardless, the term “Mexica” and all of those English letters were made up by someone. Not a single one of those words or letters existed independent of whomever made them up.

                • HorreC@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  if you would have read the artical that I liked you could indeed see they called themselves Mexica (even if I must use these letters to represent the sounds). They never used the work Aztecs, its just a dumbing down for people, which seems it was needed, but still whitewashing.

                  • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    I don’t need to read the article you linked, because SOMEONE made up the term “Mexica”, just like someone made up the term “Aztec” (and every other word ever).

                    The term is not eternal, not deemed by God (or Quetzalcoatl)…

                    Also there were a variety of peoples, to say “they called themselves Mexica” as if they were one people is actually dumbing it down, friend. They didn’t even all speak the same language.

                    Dumbing down for people, indeed. It’s all over your head, and I’m sorry