On Thursday morning, President Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act, a federal law that allows presidents to deploy the U.S. military domestically under certain circumstances, purportedly to help enforce local law enforcement amid civil unrest. Trump baselessly claimed that military presence is necessary in Minnesota’s Twin Cities to quell protests against his administration’…

Source


From Truthout via This RSS Feed.

    • agentant@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Your example is the PLA putting down a violent revolt, with the specific picture being of a guy who wasn’t harmed during said revolt?

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Violent revolt? Lmao they were college kids with alcohol bottles and stones. And they were peaceful until the CCP got antsy because they were losing control so they escalated it with literal tanks.

        • agentant@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          They lynched the soldiers they sent in on June 2nd, who were unarmed. They only escalated to armed force after they murdered those they sent before. I don’t think they should have sent in soldiers to begin with, given that’s very inflammatory even if they’re unarmed, but it doesn’t justify torching unarmed people with molotovs. Need I mention liberal democracies are guilty of the same sorts of crimes(Kent State Massacre, 1985 MOVE Bombings, Ruby Ridge, WACO Siege, ICE murder just a few days ago, all of these just in the US) and regularly arm their police with military armored vehicles and fire on protesters. The US also cracks down on protests much earlier, go to any protest in the US and there’s a good chance the police will deploy tier gas even if the event is non-violent. The Tiananmen Square protests got as big as they did because of how long it took the government to give any response.

          Western Liberal democracies also go abroad and wholesale slaughter populations in foreign nations; Vietnam; Afghanistan; Iraq and the death toll in these places far exceeds any metric who try and stamp on Tiananmen Square protests. China, by comparison, does not conduct these foreign massacres. The PRC is guilty of many crimes, I’m very critical of it myself, but it’s crimes fall far short of the United States. This has nothing to do with one or two parties, it has to do with ruling class capitalism vs working class socialism.

          • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            The soliders that ran over civilians in a jeep and killing them? Gee. Wonder why they were lynched. 🤔

            Need I mention liberal democracies are guilty of the same sorts of crimes

            Did i not say a one party system can be more efficent?