A search for Threads content on Twitter currently brings up zero results, despite plenty of links to Meta’s microblogging rival being posted on the platform.

  • 17000HerbsAndSpices@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Logic doesn’t matter. Literally do anything at all and say “it’s because free speech” or “it’s to stop cancel culture” and the fan boys will cheer it.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I won’t, and I really am against cancel culture (I’m for developing reputation systems to help you automatically ignore those you don’t want to read, but to be able to read what they say in case you suddenly want that).

      Now, this whole Twitter-Threads dynamic seems like an exemplary “toad vs viper” case.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t think cancel culture was a great tactic until I saw its effect on Alex Jones and Milo Yieanowetpahppolis.

        Deplatforming fascists works, and we have observed it. We should do more of it.

        • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          lol ‘cancel culture’ used to be called ‘boycotting’ / ‘speaking with your wallet’ used to be called ‘having an opinion’

          its not new, obviously we should punch nazis, and you can be certain anyone who says the words ‘cancel culture’ unironically is a tool with less than a 10 year memory span, max.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            ‘boycotting’ / ‘speaking with your wallet’ used to be called ‘having an opinion’

            Cancel Culture is none of those things. Cancel Culture is very specifically taking a platform away from someone who has misused it to do harm in our society.

            Should you choose to vote with your wallet and boycott destructive people, though? Yes, absolutely. But deplatforming is observably effective, because we’ve seen that many of these loud, awful people simply aren’t able to rebuild their following without the convenience of major social media platforms and interviews on major networks.

            And without that following, they aren’t shit. Alex Jones literally went bankrupt.