fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-228 天前Humans are part of the ecosystem.mander.xyzimagemessage-square114linkfedilinkarrow-up1306arrow-down142file-text
arrow-up1264arrow-down1imageHumans are part of the ecosystem.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-228 天前message-square114linkfedilinkfile-text
Ecofascism https://www.northampton.ac.uk/research-blogs/far-right-and-the-environment-key-themes-of-ecofascism/ https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/448724-investigating-the-role-of-disinformation-in-the-rise-of-eco-fascism https://gnet-research.org/2025/04/30/ecofascism-and-green-accelerationism-ghosts-of-the-past-or-a-present-danger/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofascism https://www.firstnations.org/our-programs/stewarding-native-lands/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837722004963
minus-squarebobzer@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·28 天前What do you consider pre-industrial? Agriculture directly led to the destruction of native biomes in any country that practiced it. More people = more agriculture = more land cleared. So long as most people who live die from avoidable famines, war and disease, then yes, it’s sustainable. But “in check” is probably the better term.
What do you consider pre-industrial?
Agriculture directly led to the destruction of native biomes in any country that practiced it.
More people = more agriculture = more land cleared.
So long as most people who live die from avoidable famines, war and disease, then yes, it’s sustainable. But “in check” is probably the better term.