How do you figure? Getting out of the cage and killing the tiger are both tasks which are easier to do when trapped with a baby tiger than an adult one.
That’s not how the office works. The Democrats aren’t fascists. One day, maybe, but not today. We don’t have the resources or organization to defeat fascism today. Even though the baby tiger grows up, the time that takes is time to organize.
And they would be incorrect. Pre-fascist? Fascist enabling? Sure. But they weren’t the ones trafficking innocent people to El Salvador. This is a case of overusing “fascist” until it doesn’t mean anything anymore.
How do you figure? Getting out of the cage and killing the tiger are both tasks which are easier to do when trapped with a baby tiger than an adult one.
both tigers are in there.
You’re losing the metaphor here. The tiger is the president, there is only one.
your metapho fails to capture the reality of the situation. liberal democracy breeds fascism.
Yes. Like baby tigers turn into adult tigers, that’s the whole point of the metaphor.
no. you’ve got fascism and liberalism in the fucking room. if you don’t kill tehm both, you still have fascism.
That’s not how the office works. The Democrats aren’t fascists. One day, maybe, but not today. We don’t have the resources or organization to defeat fascism today. Even though the baby tiger grows up, the time that takes is time to organize.
I’m sure you can understand that an anarchist would disagree
And they would be incorrect. Pre-fascist? Fascist enabling? Sure. But they weren’t the ones trafficking innocent people to El Salvador. This is a case of overusing “fascist” until it doesn’t mean anything anymore.