This actually perfectly demonstrates the problem with calling women “females”.
No, it demonstrates people’s inability to formulate sentences properly. The 2nd person is asking clarifying questions to be sure they understand them properly…as one should.
The only thing wrong with saying female, is in your head.
How would you say female humans when referring to a group of female humans.
I have literally no way of determining if a person is female outside a hospital setting. But there are certain characteristics that people can adopt to signify themselves as women.
So, asking how I’d refer to a group of female humans is kind of a false question outside a niche situation, or unless I’m a doctor…
But, all this is avoided by just saying “women”. Or, in the provided example, just saying “dog”, or placing “husky” after “female”.
Omg…stop
Sorry, it’s difficult to stop making sense after educating yourself. I’ll try, though.
How would you know you’re educated without being a professor
How do you know what meat is without being a farmer or a butcher?
How do you know a coffee is coffee if you aren’t a scientist
How do you know a house is a house without being an engineer
How do you know what grass is without being a Agrostologist
You aren’t educated, you are regurgitating (poor) fighting points by feminists and pro-trans (disclaimer because people assume…I’m not anti trans, I just don’t care), the same people who also (in your opinion) can’t talk about the subject because they aren’t doctors.
You are insane and I’m blocking you because it will be impossible to have a discussion with someone of your childish mindset.
🤡

