db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 year agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up186arrow-down157cross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
arrow-up129arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 year agomessage-square24linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·1 year agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism