• jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sounds like a lot of these people either have an undiagnosed mental illness or they are really, reeeeaaaaalllyy gullible.

    For shit’s sake, it’s a computer. No matter how sentient the glorified chatbot being sold as “AI” appears to be, it’s essentially a bunch of rocks that humans figured out how to jet electricity through in such a way that it can do math. Impressive? I mean, yeah. It is. But it’s not a human, much less a living being of any kind. You cannot have a relationship with it beyond that of a user.

    If a computer starts talking to you as though you’re some sort of God incarnate, you should probably take that with a dump truck full of salt rather then just letting your crazy latch on to that fantasy and run wild.

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or immediately question what it/its author(s) stand to gain from making you think it thinks so, at a bear minimum.

      I dunno who needs to hear this, but just in case: THE STRIPPER (OR AI I GUESS) DOESN’T REALLY LOVE YOU! THAT’S WHY YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR THEM TO SPEND TIME WITH YOU!

      I know it’s not the perfect analogy, but… eh, close enough, right?

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        a bear minimum.

        I always felt that was too much of a burden to put on people, carrying multiple bears everywhere they go to meet bear minimums.

        • alaphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          /facepalm

          The worst part is I know I looked at that earlier and was just like, “yup, no problems here” and just went along with my day, like I’m in the Trump administration or something