repost, but it’s been a while

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is the all-time most succinct encapsulation of libertarian thought - giving the government power by voting is tyranny, but random people getting it as a side-effect of money is Freedom.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Old enough to remember libertarians who were smugly asserting Social Security caused the Iraq War.

      Now we’re stuck with the libertarians who smugly assert that the Department of Education causes transgender teenagers.

      • aizakku@waterloolemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Can’t have transgender teens in school, if you you don’t have school! Checkmate atheists, i mean, liberals.

        /s maybe, who knows what those chuds are doing anymore

        • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Say goodbye to the old school, ergh, boring - I hate school!

          Say HELLO to the patriot Mcschool of dreams, brought to you in association with Coca-Cola - to ensure your patriot Mcschool dreams have Real magic - providing children with the very best school-like experience and for prices lower than you’d expect.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Weak minded people are easy to exploit

      In other words the people supporting this shit are idiots who have no critical thinking skills.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Get ready for a full generation of weak minded morons now that the Dept. Of Education is gone. It can always get worse.

          • sowitzer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Maybe not yet. But that is the ultimate goal. That’s not even a slippery slope fallacy. Poor people don’t need an education, let them start working when old enough for school. These are goals they are working towards little by little. If you don’t know that you are not paying attention. You are just hearing what is said by known liars and believing it for every little step until the goal is met.

            • sfu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              The removal of the DOE will just allow states to be in charge of their schools, instead of the federal gov. It doesn’t need to be federalized. Most things should be state run, not federal run. The point of having states is so people can more choice in what they want for themselves.

              If you like the way state B operates better than the state F operates, then you have the ability to either move to State F, or to work on convincing those in state B to change the way they operate. But when the fed runs it, you’re stuck with it.

              • Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                The problem with this is that there ends up being no national education standard. You take a state like Alabama, which ranks dead last in so many education metrics, and remove those federal standards. Now Alabama can just change their state standards, and suddenly they have a 100% graduation rate with all straight A students. Guess what happens when Cletus the Alabama valedictorian tries to get a job in the medical field or the tech sector.

                And that’s before we ever even talk about funding. States get about 15% of their K-12 funding from the federal government. Where are the states going to make up that difference? Higher state taxes? Higher property taxes? Or are they just going to let already struggling schools go to shit? Guess who that affects the most?

                You really haven’t put a lot of thought into this beyond “federal gubmint bad”.

                • sfu@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  “Oh no, what will we ever do if the federal government doesn’t set our standards? We are too dumb to set our own standards!”

                  I’m pretty sure the states can figure it out on their own. And any school can feel free to set their own standards even higher if they wish.