• regdog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    This statement does not make sense. If they only survived 4 out of 5 extinction events then there should be no more sharks alive today.

      • regdog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        OK, I think I get it now. But it sounds a bit confusing. If you are listing events that sharks were not present for, then you might as well say something like Sharks survived the Big Bang

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Kind of? It’s referencing a well known set of mass extinctions that are talked about together, the ‘Big Five’, but it also is worded poorly. Instead something like “Sharks have survived the most recent four of the ‘Big Five’ mass extinction events.” might be better?