If rolled out widely, this would make web browsers and third-party YouTube clients without a DRM license unusable for YouTube playback, download, etc. This would include almost all open-source web browsers and almost all third-party YouTube clients. Archive link to reddit post about this

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I used to when the price was fair for family plan, but now I’m on the high seas. It’s a price issue, they are making billions , no need to fleece us.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      False. Fake news. You’ve just invented that out of nowhere like a desperate trumpet who doesn’t know how to use Google.

      YT has never made a dime unless that’s changed in the last year. YT has always been a loss leader.

      Stop lying to win internet arguments. It’s pathetic and sad.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Your info is very outdated, YouTube made billions in profit for years already

      • Don_alForno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        It doesn’t matter what YouTube makes. They belong to google, and the data they harvest goes to google as well. Their algorithm’s influence on what people see and on their opinions contributes to google’s success and political interests, just as Xitter does for Musk. And by staying “free” to use, they ensure that no competitor will likely rise up and take those benefits from them. If they try to shut out third party apps and browsers, that’s because by forcing people into Chrome they can harvest even more data.