Steve Witkoff said the Russian leader had an artist paint a portrait of Trump and gave it to the American president as a gift. Witkoff called Putin “super smart” and not “a bad guy.”

  • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    Because my narrative actually makes sense and adds up, unlike the “official” absence of a narrative.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I did not present any narrative at all. I only asked you to support your claim.

          • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            26 days ago

            And I did. I stated that you cannot find fault in my narrative. If you provide a narrative other than mine, it is likely faulty because it is contrived.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              26 days ago

              Well, I posit that it was done by mind controlling aliens from Mars. I will also provide no evidence, and you cannot disagree or find fault in my narrative as yours is contrived.

              • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                26 days ago

                That’s just defensive adolescent reduction to absurdity from you. No pigeonchess please.

                My narrative stands up to criticism. The “official nonstory” does not.

                • catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  26 days ago

                  Yes, that’s my point. There’s nothing in your narrative to criticize, because you haven’t provided any evidence. It’s pure conjecture.

                  • Grass Cat@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    26 days ago

                    Yes my narrative fills in the blanks of what actually happened in Butler PA, but it absolutely is not conjecture. I explain how all of the REAL things that happened in Butler PA that are public knowledge all fit together and make sense. Nothing is conjecture. The school roof was in clear view of the rally, yet outside the “official perimeter” and trump’s SS was set up in its direction with a clear view of the roof. Crooks, a loner trumpee who liked guns and had previously participated in rightwing military propaganda as a younger kid, was witnessed on the roof by multiple rallygoers approximately ten minutes before the shootings. There was a man in black filmed on the watertower directly behind Crooks during the shootings. This is all available online, including the aerial layout of the rally grounds. There is no motive for Crooks. There is no evidence Crooks fired his gun. There is no evidence trump was shot. The fight fight fight was against human nature. It was staged. None of this is conjecture. Do better please.