• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    They’ll survive it, their markets and investments aren’t overvalued like ours are. They’ll crash, re-evaluate their societal priorities, and start to build again

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I mean every society has to rebuild after a crash, I’m just optimistic that they’ll do it faster

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Got a summary? I know the onus is on me, but I’m not likely to dig much further

              • tetris11@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                Yeah, but that’s only a problem if elderly orderlies is an underpaid job that no one wants, and if people can’t afford to live on it when choosing such a profession.

                If the economy adjusts or society adjusts such that caring for the elderly is a highly sought out and secure job that can easily pay a mortgage, what’s the issue?

                This is what I mean when I say they will crash and their economy will adjust.

                • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  There aren’t enough tax payers paying into the system to sustain the end of life care, retirement funds/pensions/social security equivalents that an elderly population that large. when you have a 1:1 ratio of people paying in vs paying out your assistance levels will be extremely weak.

                  No nation can sustain that large of an elder population. It’s not economically viable.