Context: Donald Trump spewing bullshit about annexing Canada and Greenland. Meanwhile, Congress has been dragging their feet for YEARS on resolving Puerto Rico’s territorial status.

Citizens living in US territories do not receive equal representation in congress. For instance, PR has one “delegate” to the House (not an official voting member) and no senators. Taxation without representation.

Although, at this point I wouldn’t blame PR if they changed their minds about wanting to become the 51st state.

  • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Oh I believe if you had a referendum right now, PR would go for independence. Tying yourself up to this ship would be bad news. Trump wouldn’t just bring back bombing Vieques, he’d turn the main island into a firing range.

    I wonder if he’d deport me since I have a PR birth certificate.

    • 60d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      I wonder if he’d deport me since I have a PR birth certificate.

      Easy way to tell:

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’m not so sure. Climate change had doomed PR. Increasing storms, sea level rise, and location make it an increasingly unviable place to live. If they go out on their own they have nowhere to go.

      As it they can move to a state and vote without needing any government approval or immigration. They are US citizens. I live in Florida and have a fair number of friends who are from PR. All of their families are planning on moving here.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Moving is the only part that makes sense, until the trumpets convince the Supremes that birthright citizenship isn’t anymore.

        You can be sure PR citizens will be high on the list to be deported back to the island, and with fema and the rest of the doge shut downs, they’ll be fucked by the next hurricane anyway.

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          It would take more than removing birthright citizenship. Congress granted U.S. citizenship to Puerto Rico citizens in 1917.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Just heads up, pointing this out makes his cult happier, they fully want him to snub a Hispanic territory for a country that says ‘speak white’ to other European languages also originating from white people.

  • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    He keeps saying he wants to make Canada a state but we all know he means “territory” or at least that’s what the ultimate outcome would be. The people around him are not dumb enough to create a new massive state with like 50 EC votes that would 100% vote Democrat.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    That’s cool, I didn’t think Puerto Ricans had expressed a clear preference, but 56% is pretty good. What are we waiting for? Let’s define a path, let’s start walking it. Let’s chat about whether it’s the path they want.

    After a quick read on the issue, the biggest argument against was that Hispanics vote Democrat. But now that Trump broke that trend, maybe now’s the time to get Republicans on board.

    Both mainland us and PR have a lot to offer each other. PR can benefit from more investment in their economy, healthcare, infrastructure, etc, we can benefit from both a slight change in perspective, additional business and tourism opportunities, etc.

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Hmm but if the big stumbling block before was that one of the only 2 parties you have to choose from didn’t want PR to become a state on the basis of its population generally voting the other party, and now that’s changed and they prefer the party that previously opposed their integration in to the union, wouldn’t the party that formerly supported them now simply become opposed?

  • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    For instance, PR has one “delegate” to the House (not an official voting member) and no senators. Taxation without representation.

    That’s the kinda stuff people have had to actively ignore in order to be surprised by current events. Like that’s straight up a colony. The thing the US used to be before allegedly abolishing the concept.

  • techclothes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Pretty sure by 51st state he means Puerta Rico like status. If the entirety of Canada was considered 1 state it may as well be.

  • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    “You’ll never have to vote again” was, I believe, the quote, so… Not to minimize this very real problem, but I think we all need to be worried about equal representation, right? 🤣😂😅😢

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    While I know PR probably isn’t down for becoming a state now, we know that if they did have two senators and several house members, we’d be in a lot less shit right now. Hell, how many electrical votes would they have been in 2016 and 2024?

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Although close the last couple times PR voted, they voted against becoming a state…