HSR🏴☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoEntropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square141linkfedilinkarrow-up1188arrow-down123
arrow-up1165arrow-down1imageEntropy? Never heard of it.lemmy.dbzer0.comHSR🏴☠️@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square141linkfedilink
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoWhy does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoBecause if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
minus-squareThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoAnd places trees don’t grow?
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoTry thinking for a second. Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere
Why does it have to be cheaper? Why not both?
Because if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees
And places trees don’t grow?
Try thinking for a second.
Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere