☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 12 天前DeepSeek will be banned: it's good, it's fast, and it's free. So it cannot be allowed.youtu.beexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down18
arrow-up192arrow-down1external-linkDeepSeek will be banned: it's good, it's fast, and it's free. So it cannot be allowed.youtu.be☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 12 天前message-square31fedilink
minus-squareu_die_for_elmer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·12 天前https://securityconversations.com/episode/inside-the-deepseek-ai-existential-crisis-chinese-backdoor-in-medical-devices/ If you ignore the kind of laent anti China crap, this is a pretty good analysis from a technical perspective. When someone does something faster and cheaper we used to call that progress. Not if China does it I guess, and not if it’s open source even if Meta did the same thing with llama.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·12 天前Exactly, and these kinds of policies will only ensure that the west starts falling behind technologically. Stifling innovation to prop up monopolies will not be a winning strategy in the long run.
https://securityconversations.com/episode/inside-the-deepseek-ai-existential-crisis-chinese-backdoor-in-medical-devices/ If you ignore the kind of laent anti China crap, this is a pretty good analysis from a technical perspective. When someone does something faster and cheaper we used to call that progress. Not if China does it I guess, and not if it’s open source even if Meta did the same thing with llama.
Exactly, and these kinds of policies will only ensure that the west starts falling behind technologically. Stifling innovation to prop up monopolies will not be a winning strategy in the long run.