- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.world
- memes@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.world
- memes@lemmy.ml
- Stop talking about the data, start talking about the political interference. There’s a reason Trump is against the ban now. - Yeah, because it’s extremely unpopular and he’s going to get blamed for it. - No, because it helped him win, he doesn’t care what people want in general, he wants to win. - He cares about being liked. That’s all he ever wanted, to fill stadiums with supporters who love him. 
 
 
- Cause ByteDance “donated” to the inauguration fund? And now Tiktok will censor and promote for both the CCP and Trump? 
 
- My data will be stolen no matter which corporation I go with. Frankly, I don’t care which government they’re under. Hell, if I lived in Texas, I’d have to worry if I talked about driving a friend out of state to get an abortion. China wouldn’t care. - deleted by creator 
 
- Now, what if end-user applications were forced to be open and audited, so everyone can know exactly what the app is and isn’t doing for China - or America - and not individually choose and make laws based on that. - No, transparency is too terrifying to techno-capitalism. 
- What is China going to do with my data? Who fucking cares? - Do you own window blinds? - Sure, but in this case you aren’t choosing between “blinds” and “no blinds” - You’re choosing who gets peak in your windows. It’s either going to be the US or China, and quite frankly, I’m far more afraid of the US because I live here. The US can actually use my data against me. China almost certainly can’t. 
 
- Suppress stories about Tiben, Hongkong, the Uyghurs, Taiwan… Hey, whatever happened to Gedhun Choekyi Nyima? 
 
- I wonder if the forces behind the ban blame TikTok for the Pro-Palestinian bent of the younger generations. - I’m confident that this is an element of things, even if indirectly. It’s been interesting to see the finely tuned, Hasbara propaganda machine become unstable. TikTok has definitely been a component of that 
 
- The whole idea about forcing TikTok to be sold, is that right now TikTok doesn’t have to obey any laws. - Who is out there saying this? That’s ridiculous. Are foreign people exempt from our laws when they visit? No? Then why would you believe foreign companies are exempt? - Because they don’t visit. - You’re right they’re just here. But that presence triggers jurisdiction. - TikTok app merely being operational in the US is not presence. Implying that would be as ridiculous as giving a country jurisdiction over you becaues you sent a letter there. - It absolutely is presence. Otherwise the Brazilians couldn’t deal with X either. This is far more than sending a letter. And pretending we have no jurisdiction over companies operating in our country is ridiculous. - Any real arguments for falling under jurisdiction for sending network packets? Does it have to be a company, or do you also have to abide by jurisdiction of the country I’m in? My server is in? Your server is in? - This isn’t a joke. This is pretty settled law. If you’re offering services in a country you must abide by their laws. 
 
 
 
 
 
- Funny how you had replied to a comment from me in another discussion explaining what that meant and now you’re acting like you had never seen that comment. - When I ask that question I’m looking for a source point. Usually when multiple people show up on social media claiming something like this it means some podcaster somewhere put it out there. 
 
- So what keeps them to obey US laws? - Ok, let me ask a different question. What can be done when a product from a foreign country doesn’t obey laws? Hint, it is happening on Sunday. - What laws? We literally just passed a law to ban them. There wasn’t any law they were breaking before. This is the corporate version of Congress passing a bill to send you to prison. - Saying this is the only regulation possible is breathtakingly ridiculous. 
 
 
 




