m_f@midwest.socialM to Fun Loops ▶️@midwest.socialEnglish · 2 months ago[R] Stupidest ways people have solved coding interviewsloops.videoexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down11
arrow-up123arrow-down1external-link[R] Stupidest ways people have solved coding interviewsloops.videom_f@midwest.socialM to Fun Loops ▶️@midwest.socialEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squareScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoIt doesn’t, the array is still in the same order it started in, it’s members are just printed to the console in numerical order. It just prints the number 1 after 1 ms, 2 after 2 ms, 3 after 3 ms etc.
minus-squareRandelung@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoInstead of print you could add them to a second array, though. Even clear the original first for “in place” sorting; never mind the memory allocation for the lambdas.
It doesn’t, the array is still in the same order it started in, it’s members are just printed to the console in numerical order.
It just prints the number 1 after 1 ms, 2 after 2 ms, 3 after 3 ms etc.
Instead of print you could add them to a second array, though. Even clear the original first for “in place” sorting; never mind the memory allocation for the lambdas.