• Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Sounds like I’m glad “home row” style typing fell out of favour. It may be the theoretically fastest way to type eventually, but it seems to lead to pretty rigid behaviour. Adapting to new things as they come along and changing your flow to move with them instead of against them is just a much more comfortable way to live. Even if I only type 80% as fast.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I have no idea what you mean by “fell out of favour”. Does your keyboard not have pips on F and J? People still touch type. Dunno what to tell you.

      You’re getting hung up on “home row”. You still have to move your hand from the keyboard to the mouse and back. It’s the same problem, whether or not you know how to type well and stare at your hands, except now you have to add steps for “look at the screen” and “look back at your hands”.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Fell out of favour in that it isn’t taught as “the correct way to type” any more. Largely because most devices you type on now wouldn’t even have physical keys. So learning home row typing for the occasional time the thing you are typing on is a physical full sized keyboard just disrupts the flow of everything else.

        Being perfectly optimal isn’t as productive as it feels, especially when it leads to resistance to change and adapt.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Home row is absolutely still taught as the “correct” way to type. Source: kids are in elementary school