You must log in or register to comment.
Can’t see the other side- if it’s a 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional object in can still be accurate because of perspective.
There’s a third dimension now?
Those are fragments from the obverse side of the mostly-intact lower left. Artist has as much attention to detail as the person who pointed it out
Sure it does, it’s just not round.
Only if you assume the object was round. I mean it was almost certainly meant to be round, but it could be right ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Blame Banach and Tarski
