JD Vance said that ‘American power comes with certain strings attached’

Archive link

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    DO IT!

    Just look at the TPP. The US tried to write the rules and the rest of the partners said, “No.” The US said, “Screw you guys, we’re going home!” and stormed off in a snit assuming the deal would fall apart without them but it didn’t and it ended up being better without the US imperialist bullshit. Then, US farmers realized that they were getting fucked because the US wasn’t part of the deal and the US came back demanding to be let in and the US imperialist bullshit restored to the agreement. Once again the partnerd said, “No” and the US was allowed to join under the negotiated terms. As a result the deal is much more balanced and fairer to the other partners.

    Let’s let the US leave whatever they want to leave, renegotiate everything without them, then only let them return under the new terms. The world will be a much better place in the end.

    • schema@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yeah, what Trump voters don’t realize is that the US withdrawing from NATO would mean an end to most of their soft power. You can have the biggest and most modern army in the world, but if you give up your bases all over the world you severely limit your way to project that power.

      As opposed to what the propaganda talking points say, the US doesn’t have these bases to protect others out of the kindness of their hearts. It’s to project their military power, to be ready to strike within minutes, no matter where. This is an incredibly powerful position in the world. Giving those up will of course cost them less in short term, but in the long term it’s probably one of the biggest geopolitical mistakes in history, since they will probably not be allowed back once the bases are gone. And the money saved will quickly evaporate in the military budget.

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is completely insane revisionist history. The TPP was in fact ripe for ratification, with full support of American ratification from its international partners, but was logjammed in the United States due to a Republican Senate.

      The reformed TPP is similar to the original one and only exists to work around the loss of U.S. as a participant. And the U.S. never rejoined. There’s a grain of truth to the thing about farmers, at least, but good gravy, this is otherwise pretty nuts.