• Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Drag doesn’t believe in lesbians. Drag thinks they’re just gay women. There’s no reason gay women are special in a way that gay men and gay enbies aren’t. The only reason we have the word lesbian, is because sexist old men didn’t think women could really be gay. We should just get rid of the word and say gay woman instead.

    • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Bad take.

      You’re erasing the existence of Sappho, who was so gay for girls that the island she came from—the place heretofore unknown for anything—is now known for just how goddamn queer she was, and everyone who experiences sapphic love (hey, another word that got coined off of one poet’s fantastically omnipresent woman lust).

      Lesbians. Sapphic lesbians. From Lesbos. That Sappho started. Why?

      Girls pretty.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        And yet nobody calls gay men thessalians, despite Achilles being from Thessaly. It’s because we don’t need to, we already have the word gay. The only reason we don’t just use the word gay for women, is that homophobes thought women couldn’t be gay. They needed a euphemism. We don’t need a euphemism.

        • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Let’s make things clear: you don’t need a euphemism.

          I want more euphemisms. I want this language to have some goddamn options and I want the number of words in this language to never fucking decrease for any reason.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            Drag thinks that means you want words like aryan and the N word with the hard R to stick around, and drag doesn’t like that opinion.

            • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              Every single one of those words should exist. Even the slurs. That way, we know who’s trouble.

              Motherfucker, I do not believe I made myself clear, so allow me to retort:

              Languages should not ever shrink at all. Ever. Shrinking languages is some nazi-ass, 1984-ass fascist shit.

                • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  It is not.

                  To censor a language is to censor thought itself.

                  And if slurs and insults become censored and incapable of thought, what else is on the table, up for removal? Words about being queer, words about body rights, words about lived experiences, words that aren’t fucking corpo-washed.

                  I have made my point in an unerring straight goddamn line.

                  Languages should not shrink for any goddamn reason.

                  Now go to bed, it’s 5:37 in the morning.

                  • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    19 days ago

                    No, drag means it’s hypocritical of you, because drag invented a new word and you didn’t use it. In fact, you used a different, more common word instead during the appropriate time to use drag’s word.