• Euphorazine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    The only thing I would add is that with the electoral system, it’s not the candidate with the most electoral votes that win, it’s the candidate who gets half+1 votes (270 or more currently)

    If candidate A wins 250 votes, candidate B wins 200 votes and candidate C wins 88 votes, candidate A does not win. If there is no winner, the house of representatives votes for president, each state getting one vote.

    Another reason why third party presidential candidates are never serious contenders.

    • nzeayn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      can we just set up a bot that does nothing but reply with these two comments to every “why no 3rd parties bro” question. We’ll turn it on three months before every US election and let it travel around lemmy servers. then turn if off until this whole cycle repeats.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Wait, why aren’t you fixing the voting system? Yall clearly understand it’s faults. Don’t you believe in democracy?

        “You dont get to vote how you want, and you will be reminded every election.”

        Clown country.

        • authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          do you think that a half dozen lemmy users are capable of changing the voting system?

          there have been some initiatives passed in some states, but thats only half the election. And the people in power benefit from a first past the post voting system, so transitioning out is slow work. It is possible, and it is happening, but there’s not a magic button that says “swap to superior voting method” that a single socialist can press