mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 16 days agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1184arrow-down11
arrow-up1183arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 16 days agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareanti-idpol action@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·15 days agowake me up when Rust fixes its’ supply chain attacks susceptibility (solid stdlib and rejecting external crates, including transitive deps
minus-squareTehPers@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-215 days agoIf you’re hoping for the standard lib to have things built on evolving standards and ecosystems like HTTP clients, then I doubt that will ever happen. There are plenty of examples of why that would be a terrible idea (urllib, std::regex, etc).
wake me up when Rust fixes its’ supply chain attacks susceptibility (solid stdlib and rejecting external crates, including transitive deps
If you’re hoping for the standard lib to have things built on evolving standards and ecosystems like HTTP clients, then I doubt that will ever happen. There are plenty of examples of why that would be a terrible idea (
urllib,std::regex, etc).