mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 6 months agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1185arrow-down11
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 6 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareTraister101@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up10·6 months agoGonna need to start calling it C++++ at this point. So much extra shit in the standard library
minus-squareEphera@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14·6 months agoI’m not sure, C# wants to hear the response to this…
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 months agoHonestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
minus-squareTraister101@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 months agoNah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoSure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.
Gonna need to start calling it C++++ at this point. So much extra shit in the standard library
C# be like, am i a joke to you?
I’m not sure, C# wants to hear the response to this…
C/C++ : Yeah.
Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Sure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.