I haven’t heard anything in months. Maybe there is legal trouble?

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    Definitely a long way off from how active they were a year or two ago.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Feels like there’s a lot of that going around.

      It seems like every FOSS project I stumble across these days hasn’t had a commit in at least a year.

      Not the huge ones, obviously, but anything even slightly off the mainstream.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    My wife has one, it’s been a long time since she have talked about it though.
    She used to mention when improvements were made.

    Edit: Pinephone.

      • Krafting@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is, but they are talking about the hardware in these last release notes, about a chip that will get replaced in the actual hardware, therefor i don’t think they are completely dead! Long lice Pine64

      • maniii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is the same/similar problem that Nokia/Maemo and Sailfish/merOS have all had.

        Some things are binary-blobs + NDAs and many things are still locked, the OSS community can only do so much before they hit the commercial roadblocks.

        We need a complete CoreBoot + OSS silicon-chips + OSS firmware + all-community / all-commercial dual production lines.

        The open-source-based company should be able to sell both the commercial locked-version and the oss-all-unlocked-version with the ability to switch infinitely between the two models.

        But the world of electronics rarely will ever work or reach that level of interoperability , repairability or recycling this way. Not for a long time maybe in some distant future.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pine64s “problem” was they only ever did the hardware. Like they sponsor some software, but they make and sell hardware. They gained a lot of popularity from the Pinephone, but very little changed internally at Pine64. They’re still the same they always were

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      What? I get really annoyed at hardware companies that do software. Like, first thing I’m gonna do with anything I buy is wipe it and install my own OS. Why would you waste so much time making a forked OS?

      Do one thing, and do it well.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        for example to make sure you have got drivers.

        but then, you need software for less computer-like devices too, like a smart watch or earbuds. do you immediately reflash those too? and who will make the software?

  • exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Certainly feels like it and I personally wouldn’t buy anything from them at the moment.

    Edit: would -> wouldn’t

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I have ordered stuff from them before and they delivered every time. I don’t think they would sell something they don’t plan to ship. If you look at the inventory it is a little parse.

      Also I believe they contract an outside company to manage the warehouse and to fulfill orders

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have ordered stuff from them before and they delivered every time. I don’t think they would sell something they don’t plan to ship. If you look at the inventory it is a little parse.

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t have concerns about shipping, more about the community building and support aspect of their products.

        If you’re happy with a product’s current state then fine, but if not you’re pretty much on your own.

          • exu@feditown.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            They require a lot of driver work to get everything working. Many of their chips for example only support h264 hardware decoding at the moment, although they would be capable of h265 as well. Another example would be the PineTab 2, which now after a few years has working wifi and an alpha bluetooth driver. Yes, it’s always getting better, but very slowly and it might well take another few years until you can just run a mainline kernel with full hardware functionality.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Other people claim they have ordered and delivery was not happening for half a year etc. Seemed like something was up with supply.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Or they are getting sued over patient violations (pure speculation but that has happened to other small companies)

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m focusing more on the community building and advancing software parts of the work they did/do. Some products are in a pretty good state, but that’s not the case for others.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They had monthly updates almost 2 years straight. They weren’t big but they had the latest news. The fact they suddenly went quite with little community engagement is concerning to me

      • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        To me that just signifies the company has stabilized and no longer needs to put out statements constantly to keep eyes on them for marketing reasons.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sometimes this can just be that the person driving engagement has moved on or shifted focus. I don’t think it’s a large company by any means.

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Most orgs can’t have someone doing marketing full-time.

        If its one update per year, they’re alive and focusing on the important stuff