• LWD@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    The argument that “It is just a new, additional means of tracking users” also doesn’t really make sense - even if we assume that this is new means of tracking.

    It is a new means of tracking. It is extra telemetry provided by Mozilla to advertisement partners.

    it doesn’t make a difference.

    It makes a difference because Mozilla went out of its way to inject this tracking into a browser that is supposedly made for users.

    It does not escape me, by the way, that Mozilla is now a de jure advertising corporation: since FakeSpot they’ve sold private data to third party advertisers, and since Anonym they’ve operated an advertising-specific wing.

    Because of this this, Mozilla can no longer make any statements about online advertising without a huge conflict of interest, which they should disclose.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      How do you think Mozilla was funded before Fakespot and Anonym were acquired?

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m not a fan of Mozilla accepting money from Google, but it’s absolutely preferable to having a clause in their privacy policy that allows them to sell geolocation data directly to advertising partners. Pre-2023, I don’t think they did that.

        • Vincent@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          And where did that Google money come from?

          (It’s a rhetorical question of course: it came from Firefox users clicking on ads.)