• macattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Their current userbase is not their target userbase. They are trying to reach a more mainstream audience but all of their attempts to monetize are seen as useless by their current userbase.

    • They want to increase revenue w/ ads - A loud swath of FF users are tech savvy and have adblocking enabled
    • They want to pivot towards AI - A loud swath of FF users see AI as gimmicky

    Repeat ad-nauseum

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It really is strange. They really should be copying the success of the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikipedia.

      Especially right now as Google is truly finally breaking a lot of adblocking and pushing a fight with adblockers in the YouTube space.

      It’s a perfect storm of opportunity to stand out as a solid, differing offer, but they’re going to blow it as usual.

      • ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m willing to bet that the people who switch to Firefox for ad-blockers and ad-free YouTube aren’t the kinds of people who are donating much to Mozilla. People in online forums talk a big game about wanting to pay for products and not be the product. But it seems like people don’t really want to pay any meaningful amount of money for a browser.

        • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          the people who switch to Firefox for ad-blockers and ad-free YouTube aren’t the kinds of people who are donating much to Mozilla

          I went to donate to Mozilla when I switched back to it from chrome early last year. It said on their website by the donate link, which was very difficult to find, that the proceeds from those donations did not go towards firefox but towards their other projects.

          I don’t know if that’s the case today, but there was no way to contribute to firefox directly when I sought it out, or at least not in a way I could find. Maybe it was a stipulation of the Googlegeld, idk.

          They really should be copying the success of the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikipedia

          Step 1: Be hilariously wealthy from prior investments and businesses Step 2: Do a thing nobody has ever done before at a time when interest rates mean money is free Step 3: Blind luck

          I’m not sure how they’re supposed to reproduce those at this point.

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, the amount of money they get from donations is so tiny compared to what they need for developing Firefox, that they don’t even divert it for Firefox.
            They use it for activism, community work and in the past, they’ve also passed it on to other open-source projects, which are also important for the web but don’t have the infrastructure or public awareness to get donations directly.

              • abbadon420@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                That’s unnecessary. Everything upwards of like 300k is not salary, it’s business money. That person is a natural business.