Yes, the essay is 2 years old, but its relevancy should overcome that factor.
It is not a coincidence that women’s equality is being rolled back at the same time that authoritarianism is on the rise. Political scientists have long noted that women’s civil rights and democracy go hand in hand, but they have been slower to recognize that the former is a precondition for the latter. Aspiring autocrats and patriarchal authoritarians have good reason to fear women’s political participation: when women participate in mass movements, those movements are both more likely to succeed and more likely to lead to more egalitarian democracy. In other words, fully free, politically active women are a threat to authoritarian and authoritarian-leaning leaders—and so those leaders have a strategic reason to be sexist.
that’s why the people pushing “traditional gender role” ideals make it a point to raise girls to be nothing more than subservient man property. i would bet on a group of 50 angry women winning a fight against 100 republican men any day
i would bet on a group of 50 angry women winning a fight against 100 republican men any day
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. They’d be fighting for their lives. And, they’re definitely going to be better organized.
Increase the number of male republicans for a better payout on the bet.
Is this basically a gendered flavour of “divide and rule”?
See also “boomers vs millennials”, “your favourite skin colour vs the other skin colours”, “blue collar vs white collar”, and IDK what the fuck else
They’ll do anything to keep us from understanding that it’s fiscal class that unites nearly all of us.