This is the reply:
As a model running through DuckDuckGo’s privacy layer, I can provide you with accurate information about their privacy features.
DuckDuckGo is a search engine that prioritizes user privacy. They have a strong commitment to protecting user data and have implemented various measures to ensure anonymity. Here are some key aspects of their privacy features:
- No tracking: DuckDuckGo does not track users’ searches, browsing history, or any other personal information.
- No personal data collection: They do not collect or store any personal data, including IP addresses, user agents, or other identifiable information.
- Encrypted searches: Searches are encrypted, which means that even your ISP or network administrators cannot see what you’re searching for.
- No targeted ads: DuckDuckGo does not display targeted ads, which reduces the risk of data collection and profiling.
Regarding cases where DuckDuckGo’s privacy was questioned, there have been a few instances:
- 2011: DuckDuckGo was criticized for using Amazon Associates, which could potentially track user behavior. However, they quickly addressed the issue and removed the affiliate program.
- 2019: A security researcher discovered a bug in DuckDuckGo’s browser extension that could potentially leak user data. The issue was promptly fixed, and an audit was conducted to ensure the security of their systems.
- 2020: DuckDuckGo faced criticism for using Microsoft’s Bing API, which some argued could compromise user privacy. However, DuckDuckGo clarified that they do not share user data with Microsoft and that their partnership is limited to search results.
It’s essential to note that DuckDuckGo has consistently demonstrated a commitment to user privacy and has taken steps to address any concerns or issues that have arisen. They are transparent about their practices and have implemented robust measures to protect user data.
If you have any more questions or concerns about DuckDuckGo’s privacy features, feel free to ask!
Is anybody using duckduckgo over searx or other search engines? What is your experience?
Asking a parrot if its house is safe.
I use DDG, BTW. But searxng is very cool.
I selfhost a searxng instance and honestly forget it’s a thing until I’m rebooting my pi or something then wonder why search isn’t working lmao
I don’t use searxng because I’m comfortable with ddg instant answers. We should build an open source alternative like duckduckhack.
Edit: Dunno why people downvoted, but in my opinion having a local js “addon” which for example can convert inch to cm if you search for “2inch in cm” (obviously all should be locally processed) would be very useful.
In other news, CNN says the best news source is CNN.
DDG is fine, it works on vpns and Tor. No login required. It’s good enough.
Yeah, I used it for a long while in the past. Now mostly on searxNG, but I still like the bangs and quick results from ddg. Kagi is also pretty good, but feels a bit too pricey in my country.
I want to like kagi, but I value privacy, so logging in for searching is antithetical and just outside of my usage model.
Maybe if they supported micro payments to give you like 10 minutes of searching, but I don’t see them doing that
Yeah, this makes it also quite a bit less interesting to me. Perhaps it would be better if they could use donations and have a free instance for everyone. But I suppose that earns much less, and having people host their own instances does not seem to be on the roadmap for them.
I did very briefly think it would be a cool project to set up a kagi reseller. A search proxy on tor, people send you micro payments in monero get a cookie set, and can use a few searches in kagi through the proxy.
It’s all doable right now, but it depends on kagi honoring their API and pricing and not shutting such a service down.
That would’ve been kinda interesting.
I think you can use kagi on as many of your own devices as you want right? I suppose you could share your account with multiple people (probably against their tos, I guess) and make it more private that way. Can’t really tell much with a bunch of searches from multiple people and you paying whomever is the owner of the account.
You end up responsible for them though.
searxng has bangs too
!bang to search using a specific engine, !!bang to redirect to a search engine’s page
I didn’t know that, very useful. I suppose this is only for using other search engines like google, bing, etc… right?
Or can it also search immediately on other websites like metacritic, rotten tomatoes by using bangs?
DDG’s former owner ran a data collection business. Make what you want out of it.
Sounds like the right person for the job, someone that understands the problem and industry
You running the Trump campaign in your spare time?
True, we should make rapists the head of women protection police squads, and thieves the head of banks.
Edit: TIL internet users on Lemmy are dumb enough to not detect sarcasm
Some people are not smart enough to convey sarcasm online without coming off sincere.
There are far more people with a crippled or lacking sarcasm meter on internet. My guess is you belong to this category.
What are some of your favourite searx instances? I know I’m going to get some heat for this, but because of how slow searx can be + missing search results forcing me to use brave search. I usually use brave search over ddg.
Any tips for searx to make it faster etc. would be appreciated
I use the closest one to me from searx.space. I suppose hosting an instance yourself will give you the best response times, but it always still takes a moment while it searches through multiple search engines. If you only care about the results of one engine (e.g. google) then you could disable the others. Might speed it up a bit.
DDG chatbot uses chatgpt protocol, so how much privacy is there in this app?
It obfuscates the user each time you use it and doesn’t log any info?
So while the query is maybe logged on chatgpts side for their own usage. Hopefully they shouldn’t be able to build a profile against you.
Metadata tags mean they can try, idk how easy it is tho
i just use my local searxng instance and get results from like 10 engines including ddg, then filter with ublacklist
I love searxng in theory, and I use it as my default search engine, but very often I am missing results; I don’t know if it’s deliberate censorship from bing and google so you don’t use their apis on 3rd party platforms, or if searxng is just buggy, but no matter what search engines I enable in the config, I am missing results.
i have that issue as well, sometimes it’s missing results and other times i get the same result repeated on page 2. not sure why that happens, but i guess it’s just a bit buggy.
Ublacklist works with searx? Good to know, I want to try this myself.
Your search results must be so clean and useful.
yeah it works but if you use a local instance you have to compile the extension yourself to include your instance.
No-Script and they redirect you to their no-script search results. Pretty neat !
But searxNG is my go to at the moment !
I also use SearxNG for all my searches at the moment. But the instance I use is not that fast. Might have to look into hosting one myself.
How to add it to Firefox?
