• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I can’t believe people construed the lack of this feature in a brand new software as bad Canonical want to kill deb! It’s a brand new software. Features need work. Either go and write them or wait for someone else to do it.

    • pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can’t believe people construed the lack of this feature in a brand new software as bad Canonical want to kill deb!

      Most loud mouth open source enthusiasts are often toxic entitled choosing beggars. If any of their desires are not met, the project is dying or dead even though the statistics say otherwise.

      Fork it and fix things you want to make it better?

      No way bro. I want someone else to work on the feature I requested one year ago.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They removed installing another package that did this by default in the same version where they introduced the App Center. Ubuntu Software never handled installing third-party debs, gdebi did. And in the version where they introduced the App Center, they stopped bundling gdebi by default.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That would definitely be valid for a smaller community supported distro like mint, but canonical is a big company that already has kind of a bad reputation for things like that so I think it was reasonable for people to complain

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        A big company eh? They’re about 20 times smaller than Red Hat. They very much depend on Debian and the larger FOSS community to get their OS built.

        I’ve been on this train since 2004 and I’ve been paying attention. Not all but a lot of the flak they’ve been getting over the years has been based on misinformation and ignorance. But trying to get things objective and correct doesn’t make for a good flame war.

  • Irdial@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s sort of annoying that they removed that feature in the first place. Recently, I’ve been using the Nala frontend for APT, since it maintains history similar to DNF/yum, so I try to install all packages through the command-line. The Ubuntu App Center has always been a mild disaster…

  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean of course it is strange to not have that feature.

    But guys please dont install apps from random .deb files! It is extremely insecure, may never be updated and is just bad

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        If the hash and the binary come from the same download location, how does this improve anything?

        Also always nice is when there is a PGP signature but the key cannot be found anywhere.

  • Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    it’s so annoying that these repositories are so ancient that debs are necessary at all . but it comes in handy for things like lutris, which Ubuntu and mint shipped a broken version for at least a year