It’s an older article, sir, but it checks out.

  • moistclump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    Goss added: “There was probably some really, really important information in these documents.”

    When asked by a reporter if the black ink was meant to intentionally obscure, Goss countered, “Good God, why?”

    Goss lamented the fact that the public will probably never know the particulars of such historic events as the Cold War, the civil-rights movement, or the growth of the international drug trade.

    “I’m sure the CIA played major roles in all these things,” Goss said. “But now we’ll never know for sure.”

    Lmfao, the onion is so good at what it does.

      • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        6 months ago

        Google is just terrified that a good AI will come along and they won’t own it so they’ll leave it up as long as AI is still a buzzword

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Quite sad they didn’t have this mindset for Stadia. That was a good business idea and I can see it working in the future

  • Pringles@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    God damn, I ate the onion today. In my defence, I thought they had used black highlighters instead of black alcohol ink pens or something like that, like a procurement issue, before I clicked the link and realized I’ve been bamboozled.