politics @lemmy.world · 6 months ago

CIA Chief officer ready to share Intel of Hamas top leaders to mossad

www.arktrek.shop

cross-posted to:
world@lemmy.world

CIA Chief officer ready to share Intel of Hamas top leaders to mossad

www.arktrek.shop

Dragxito@lemmy.world to

politics @lemmy.world · 6 months ago

cross-posted to:
world@lemmy.world

To Halt Rafah Invasion, CIA Chief Offers Israel Intel On Hamas LeaderThe United States has been pushing the Israeli leadership against a full-scale ground invasion in Rafah.The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Chief, William Burns, has reportedly offered intelligence on Hamas military leader Yahya Sinwar to the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad. This offer comes amidst the United States urging Israeli leaders to refrain from a full-scale ground invasion in the Rafah region.Yahya Sinwar, a key

Chat

Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
link
fedilink
arrow-up
4
arrow-down
2·
edit-2
6 months ago
I’ll now incorporate into my world view that anybody who shares these physical characteristics is a war criminal. I took a statistics class once and I’m pretty sure that’s how it works.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News