mondoman712@lemmy.ml to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoA new trolley eralemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square153linkfedilinkarrow-up11.35Karrow-down130
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1external-linkA new trolley eralemmy.worldmondoman712@lemmy.ml to Fuck Cars@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square153linkfedilink
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down22·1 year agoCan always tell a hexbear crackhead from the comment alone. On the mark again.
minus-squareNuclearDolphin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·1 year agostoopid tankie, getting high on sources
minus-squareAeroLemming@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoI don’t even like tankies, but this one didn’t say anything wrong.
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoThe idea that a lack of proof refutes the idea is an argument in ignorance. Literally tankie ragebait.
minus-squareSeducingCamel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoSo we should just believe any hearsay about China bad because China bad?
minus-squareNo_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoFact that you’re calling it hearsay says plenty lmao. Go back to your Uyghur camp
Can always tell a hexbear crackhead from the comment alone. On the mark again.
stoopid tankie, getting high on sources
I don’t even like tankies, but this one didn’t say anything wrong.
The idea that a lack of proof refutes the idea is an argument in ignorance. Literally tankie ragebait.
So we should just believe any hearsay about China bad because China bad?
Fact that you’re calling it hearsay says plenty lmao. Go back to your Uyghur camp