fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 months agoSoupmander.xyzimagemessage-square196fedilinkarrow-up1820arrow-down17
arrow-up1813arrow-down1imageSoupmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square196fedilink
minus-squareEvil_Shrubbery@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·7 months agoGazpacho, non-vegan.
minus-squareBorovicka@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoBut eating the rich is vegan, no?
minus-squareEvil_Shrubbery@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoNormally yes, because you can’t do more for nature & people than that. But in this case it’s just too late, the rich already turned into regular (tho toxic) meat as it neared the end of its life. Now, if you get a regular not-about-to-die rich and turn it into a smoothie, then yes, vegan gazpacho.
minus-squareGrass@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoTheoretically with consent, assuming the consent based veganism.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoThey consented by being there, just how we’ve consented to the state and capitalism.
Gazpacho, non-vegan.
But eating the rich is vegan, no?
Normally yes, because you can’t do more for nature & people than that.
But in this case it’s just too late, the rich already turned into regular (tho toxic) meat as it neared the end of its life.
Now, if you get a regular not-about-to-die rich and turn it into a smoothie, then yes, vegan gazpacho.
Theoretically with consent, assuming the consent based veganism.
They consented by being there, just how we’ve consented to the state and capitalism.
That’s good enough for me.