• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re remarkably bad at reading.

      Capitalism is in decline. Continuing Capitalism continues this decline. Slight bumps upward on a downward trend line does not reverse the dowmward trend. Make sense when put that way for you?

      Would it kill you to actually engage with leftist ideas, rather than run away the second you don’t have an actual response, by the way?

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Biden is slow, negative change

        Verbatim. So Biden is not bad for the nation? It’s an upward trend? And this is…bad?

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Reading is hard for you. Biden has occasional upward ticks on an overall downward trend, he isn’t an upward trend. If the ship is sinking and you don’t fix the holes, there isn’t an upward trend.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              The country is getting worse, and he is not reversing that trend. By maintaining Capitalism, he is participating in making it worse. Occasionally he comes out with a nice act or law, but within the broader context of the direction the country is going, it matters little.

              I’ve said the same thing 3 times now, you’re not getting another.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Okay. So it’s impossible for Biden to make anything better unless he undoes capitalism? Any good things he does are overshadowed by capitalism?

                Isn’t that a bit dogmatic? You’re mistaking the means (socialism) for the ends (better society, happier people).

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  He can alleviate some of its pains, but he cannot make things better overall without moving towards Worker Ownership.

                  I am not mistaking the means for the ends, the ends are achieved via means, and if Capitalism is currently continuing to decline then the ends cannot be achieved without moving towards Socialism.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    and if Capitalism is currently continuing to decline

                    You’re ignoring the “if” though. We have clear examples of how capitalism can succeed in the Scandinavian countries (I would call them socialist, but you would say they’re not, we’ve had this discussion). If Capitalism in the US moves in that direction, would you be willing to abandon socialism because we have a better path to societal happiness?