What’s your evidence, Richard Easton??!?

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    From a human perspective, yes, that’s exactly what it does

    If you want to get pedantic about the technical details, it’s not time splitting if you’re not splitting the time…

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Technically speaking, isn’t differentiating between any two things pedantic? For example the moon, and chocolate, both are things. If you don’t want to get pedantic about it.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        What I mean is if you don’t slice time into slots, you’re not using time slicing. It doesn’t make sense to talk about time slicing at all anymore

        Two devices can transmit at the same time with all sorts of setups, even on the same frequency. And it’s not inaccurate to describe time slicing as “a method to allow multiple devices to transmit and receive simultaneously”

        The question isn’t valid. Being truly pedantic would be pointing out that any number of devices can transmit at the same time, you didn’t say the messages would be received