• TaTTe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    Almost as if it’s possible to improve even the largest cities’ infrastructure to be more human friendly. Almost as if there’s no reason bad urban design should remain bad forever. Huh, who knew…

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      A lot cheaper than building nearly any other infrastructure.

      I haven’t run the numbers but I’d venture a guess that it’s even cheaper than maintaining the car bearing roads.

      • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m always blown away at how people will not think twice when billions are spent on adding an extra lane to a road, but lose their minds when a couple million are spent on a bike lane.

        I’d love to see a return on investment analysis done on something like this.

        • whereisk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s because they think you’re taking away their road (the concept of induced demand does not make for an easy headline), and are adding slower vehicles to the mix that will slow them down and they have to be twice as careful so they don’t hit anyone.

          And to be fair, the bare minimum spend, badly designed bike lanes do both: terrifying for bikers and annoying for motorists.

          It’s what happens when bike lanes are a side project amongst “serious city business”

          But proper infrastructure does not mix the two types of traffic except rarely and frees road for those that don’t have a choice but to use a car.