ylai@lemmy.ml to Gaming@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months agoPhil Spencer blames capitalism for games industry woes: 'I don't get [the] luxury of not having to run a profitable growing business'www.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down111
arrow-up1215arrow-down1external-linkPhil Spencer blames capitalism for games industry woes: 'I don't get [the] luxury of not having to run a profitable growing business'www.pcgamer.comylai@lemmy.ml to Gaming@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square121fedilink
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up12·8 months agoNo, but do you have to? You can still be a profitable company without aiming for world domination.
minus-squarewhereisk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·8 months agoNo, there are plenty of independent private game developers (Stardew Valley, Baldur’s gate etc come to mind) I was just taking Phil Spencer’s perspective, which I imagine is a platform level one.
No, but do you have to? You can still be a profitable company without aiming for world domination.
No, there are plenty of independent private game developers (Stardew Valley, Baldur’s gate etc come to mind) I was just taking Phil Spencer’s perspective, which I imagine is a platform level one.