• HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Yeah, it’s all good advice but labelling it “fault points” is kinda very insensitive and ignores that people spreading the nudes are in the wrong.

    There are ways to inform people how to protect themselves without blaming them

    • credit crazy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      How is labeling fault points fault points victim blaming you do realize when people talk about how something fails they typically use the term fault points to refer points where something was faulty like a worn tire being the reason a car crashed

      • digehode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        The phrasing was “you get fault points for” which strongly suggests assigning fault rather than listing out “points at fault”.

        Also I think the term would be “points of failure” for the way you read it. At least that’s howbive heard it used and used it myself.

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Most people aren’t engineers, it read different to me. Especially when it’s used like “you get fault points for” it sounds more personal than saying “the fault points were”. It sounds a lot like saying someone is at “fault” to someone who hasn’t heard of “fault points” before